Friday, January 26, 2018

What was Sri Ramakrishna’s message?


One distinguishing feature of almost all Indian spiritual Gurus is that they were all great poets. A poet is not necessarily someone who has a great command over a particular human language or someone who uses very flowery language in his/her writings and sayings. A poet is one whose words carry very deep spiritual meanings which keep evolving over many centuries and millennia to come. This is very important for conveying spiritual truths since, unlike mathematics, their meanings are very subjective and heavily dependent on time, space and situation. There is an element of objectivity present since the words spoken are still valid, but the meanings are subjective. It is like the eternal relation between Purusha and Prakriti. One aspect of reality is changeless and another keeps changing at every moment! Spiritual groups and organizations, which stick to the literal meanings of the words spoken by their Gurus, are often found to deteriorate quite quickly. Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev has rightly said, “There is only one way to put mystical experiences into words, and that is poetry.


Sri Ramakrishna perhaps does not qualify to be called a poet in the usual sense of the word since he never really composed any verses. But in the broader sense of the term, his words also carry very deep spiritual truths which keep evolving with time. And he was a master story teller! In this sense, it is perhaps appropriate to call him a poet. Among all his sayings and teachings, the most important one, which has perhaps stuck to the mind of all his followers, is that of renouncing lust and gold. The words lust and gold (Kamini and Kanchana, in Bengali) are perhaps two of the most commonly occurring words to be found in his Gospel. These words have usually been taken to imply renunciation, both internal and external. Monks usually begin with external renunciation, and then slowly move towards the internal aspect. Householders are expected to begin by internal renunciation, and then slowly move towards the external aspect.

Though the above interpretation of Sri Ramakrishna’s emphasis on renouncing lust and gold are still valid, there is also another interpretation which is perhaps more relevant in the current times. And this interpretation comes from the science of Kriya Yoga, also known as Kundalini Yoga. The human nervous system is said to have seven chakras beginning from Muladhara at the base of the spine to Sahasrara at the top of the head. The chakras are said to be important centers for many nerves and nadis to meet and distribute energy over the rest of the body. For most human beings, their mind and consciousness keep moving between the lower three chakras where the predominant thought is that of procreation and wealth accumulation (lust and gold). The goal of Kriya Yoga is to make the mind rise to higher chakras where deeper spiritual experiences start manifesting and finally culminating in Samadhi when the mind reaches the Sahasrara.

It can now be seen that Kriya Yoga has a direct connection with Sri Ramakrishna’s stress on renouncing lust and gold. Sri Ramakrishna was himself an accomplished Yogi who had complete mastery over his Kundalini. His words are often implied to mean practice of renunciation through Bhakti, but perhaps he also was directly referring to the path of Kundalini Yoga. In those days and times, the situation in India was not conducive for the practice of Kriya Yoga for the masses, since it requires stable societal conditions with access to good food and secured living conditions. It was perhaps for this reason that he did not explicitly ask his disciples to practice this path at that time. But now the situation in our country has changed drastically and many parts of India have a very conducive environment for these practices. With the announcement of International Yoga Day, there is also immense activity happening in this domain with many genuine Yoga teachers available to provide these lessons in a convenient manner. When wisely combined with the other three paths of Bhakti, Karma and Jnana as per each individual’s disposition, the path of Kriya Yoga can provide wonderful spiritual progress (Yoga cocktail). As Swami Vivekananda once said, "He who combines in himself both Yoga and knowledge, with him the Lord is pleased."

10 comments:

  1. Thanks Kushal for sharing,
    I think kanchan is what nature offers us to sustain this body. When we want to stick to it and possess all in the mind, inspite of its being available all the time, then we deny others the chance to use it.
    Kamini is the attraction in nature for procreation. When we try to extrapolate and again stick to that desire, we loose sight of what it is meant for and leads to !

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anyone who makes himself commit to the natural goal of evolution without being adamant about how it will be achieved, learns the best through all modes as you rightly said !

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well said, Sanjeev! Thanks for the comment.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Some comments received over email and my response:

    > It is of course about renouncing lust and gold as you write,
    > and the purpose of it. He emphasizes that salvation
    > or realisation of God is the ONLY purpose of life.
    > And he talks about practising it; an intense practice
    > which is for both monks and as well as the householders,
    > and this is the most difficult part of it.

    Though that's surely true, we can look at it in a different way which might help us in understanding it better. When we think of the goal as salvation or liberation from the birth-death cycle, it seems quite disconnected from our daily experience and that makes it harder to accept and practice. But I find the concept of Sthitaprajna in Gita to be a much better defined and a more relatable goal to follow. Liberation can often sound like running away from the world due to fear or incapability to handle things. But Sthitaprajna is truly a royal state to be in!

    > He talks about the six ripus, of which the first one
    > is indeed lust; for the householders he says how to
    > practise it: after you get a kid or two, the husband and
    > the wife should stay like brother and sister.

    I think it is better to use the term 'friend' than 'bro-sis'. It's kind of ridiculous to expect someone to look at his wife as sister! And why wait till you have kids? Husband wife should be friends from day one. I also don't think we should equate lust with physical touch. It is quite possible for husband-wife to touch each other with a feeling of love and care, without evoking lust.

    > At the same time he says that the householders need to
    > be practical as well! There is this story about the serpent
    > and the teachings of the Brahmachari who initiates the serpent.

    Striking that balance between ideal and practical is surely the hardest thing to do. That is an important aspect of the concept of Sthitaprajna!

    > And he talks about service to people with a clear
    > demarcation between 'Daya' and 'Maya'. I think the root
    > of Vivekananda's serving pepole as Shiva was Ramakrishna's
    > message though I think that the word 'Daya' has been used
    > with different meanings by Ramakrishna and Vivekananda.

    Yes, there are several important departures between the path of Vivekananda and Ramakrishna. It's actually quite remarkable how much Ramakrishna adored Vivekananda even though the two were so different from each other. That is perhaps the most important lesson for all teachers!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Can u pls differentiate between ideal and practical ? I think if there is something that can be practiced (nature allows that !), it is practical while something that I can only imagine may be an ideal.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Aren't the different paths part of journey of one's evolution (goal may be to understand reality) ? In one life, one may follow one but one has to appreciate all to understand the whole ?

    ReplyDelete
  7. > Can u pls differentiate between ideal and practical?
    > I think if there is something that can be practiced
    > (nature allows that !), it is practical while something
    > that I can only imagine may be an ideal.

    Thats a very tricky question and I partially agree with your view. For a action/decision to be practical, I think it should also be in harmony/accordance with the present societal conditions which are time-space dependent. Something which is practical in Bhopal, may not be so in Delhi. One could perhaps say that ideal is more like hard and dry logic. And practical is more like fluid intuition. Both are possible to be practiced, but blindly following the ideal has a higher possibility of leading to undesirable outcomes. Then, of course, there is a huge gray scale between absolute practical and absolute ideal. Every decision/action is always partially practical and partially ideal. To strike the right balance is the key to higher evolution!


    > Aren't the different paths part of journey of one's
    > evolution (goal may be to understand reality) ?
    > In one life, one may follow one but one has to
    > appreciate all to understand the whole ?

    A human being a mix of many different components, and each component needs to be properly addressed. Actually, it is not even possible to properly follow any one path to the exclusion of others, though the proportions may vary. Each of the four paths of Yoga are intricately intertwined.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Some comments received over email and my response:

    > I don't have any experiential evidence for Kriya yoga
    > being effective - since I have not been initiated in
    > that path. I take Paramahamsa Yogananda's word for it -
    > so, it must be really effective path to the Divine.
    > There need not be any doubt on this.

    Kriya Yoga is extremely important because it helps in bringing a harmony between the body and the mind. The other 3 paths are more at the mind level and we often tend to neglect the importance of our physicality.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Some comments received over email and my response:

    > Also, when one is under the sway of the Guru, one can
    > see how important it is, and that all of our efforts are
    > very tiny in comparison. Though, we have to put 100% of
    > our effort, it is Grace alone that brings sadhana to
    > fruition at the right time in the right proportion.

    Yes, I think that is a good measure of spiritual progress, to increasingly realise that it is God alone who does everything (without ourselves becoming tamasic).

    > Atma Vichara is not limited to the mind alone, but
    > pervades all dimensions - the body-mind-world to uproot
    > ignorance. In that sense, Atma Vichara is a direct and
    > exhaustive path - atleast this is the view of Sri Ramana
    > Maharishi and Atmananda Krishna Menon, and I think this is
    > true. This does not mean that other paths are not
    > direct, they may very well also be. There could be
    > several paths which are 'direct' in their own ways.

    That is surely a valid point, but we need to differentiate between the ideal and practical. Many Gurus have said many things but it is we who have to use our own wisdom to decide what is best for us. And these decisions should also evolve with time and space. What was good for us in the past may no longer be good for us now and may again change in future. It is highly dynamic!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Some comments received over email and my response:

    > I feel that in Kriya yoga, the element of 'kartaa' or will power takes front seat.
    > where as in authentic Jnana yoga, understanding 'just happens'
    > and has nothing 'to do'

    In Kriya or any other path of Yoga, the aspirant does feel a sense of doer-ship at the beginning, but this is supposed to decay with spiritual progress. Initially a Bhakta may feel that it is s/he who is chanting the name of the Lord, but slowly all that remains it the Lord alone. Similarly, in Kriya Yoga, the aspirant may feel at the beginning that it is s/he who is doing the asanas, but slowly the realisation dawns that it is Prakriti that is playing around with itself and we are just silent spectators.

    ReplyDelete